Source of Acoustic Noise in a 12/16 External-Rotor Switched Reluctance Motor: Stator Tangential Vibration and Rotor Radial Vibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared with internal-rotor switched reluctance motors (SRMs), external-rotor (ER) SRMs can show different vibration and acoustic noise behavior due to the differences in the designs, e.g. thinner rotor back iron to achieve smaller inertia, and longer stator pole height to improve the electromagnetic performance. This paper presents the considerations in the modeling and analysis of the acoustic noise sources of an ER SRM stator and rotor. The harmonic components of the stator tangential force density and rotor radial force density are analyzed and compared. The vibration modes, the vibration behavior, and acoustic noise of the stator and rotor are also compared. A 12/16 external-rotor SRM designed for a direct-drive E-bike application is used for the modeling, analysis, and experimental validation of vibration and acoustic noise. It is concluded that both the stator tangential vibration and the rotor radial vibration can be sources of the acoustic noise in an ER SRM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".