MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W304463183

A Study of Condom Using Behavior and Its Related Factors among College Students in Taiwan.

2007· article· en· W304463183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCollege student journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondomPsychologyHarmDemographyFeelingSexual intercourseStratified samplingFamily planningSocial psychologyPopulationHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineFamily medicineResearch methodologySyphilis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current situations of condom using behavior and its related factors among college students in Taiwan. There were two phases in the study. In phase I, 50 students from one college in the eastern, southern, middle and northern parts of Taiwan were selected to form a focus group, and were interviewed in order to further understand the reasons why they used and did not use condoms, so the information obtained became the basis of the questionnaire design. In phase II, by using stratified sampling (group sampling) method, a total of 1,200 freshmen from 12 colleges in Taiwan were selected. The results were as the followings after statistical analysis: Generally speaking, students continued to use condoms when they better understood the benefits of using condoms, such as preventing STDs, being a contraceptive, respecting the female partner and protecting oneself, decreasing the harm from rape, etc. The reasons for not using condoms are: afraid of mining the atmosphere during the first sexual intercourse, worrying about losing sexual feelings, unexpected sexual act with impulse, embarrassing to request for using the condom, and for women submitting to the male partner's sex act. INTRODUCTION According to the Disease Control Bureau (2003), there were 4,644 HIV positives between 1984-2003, among which, 36.4% were at the age level of 20-29; 33.51%, between 30-39. It is obvious that the rate of AIDS infection is increasing every year. Yen's study (Yen et al, 1998) on the sexual behavior of the male and female students in 5-year junior colleges in Taipei, who had dating behavior, indicated that the boys' premarital sex behavior increased from 20.7% in 1979 to 35.2% in 1997, and the girls' increased from 4% to 6.9%, close to 60% more, a large increasing scale. There was a similar situation in Japan as many unmarried females had frequent sexual activities, especially the girls between 15 and 25 of age, whose sexual experience (79.0%) is much higher, compared with other age levels [24-29, (63.7%), 30-39, (58.0%), 40-49, (56.1%)] (Wang, 1999). In Lin's survey (2002) 13.9% of males and 10.4% of females had sexual behavior. The rate of female sexual behavior is higher than the rate (6.9%) in Yen et al's study. The findings of another study investigating the night school students' sexual behavior in 2-year junior colleges by Yang (Yang et al, 1998) are as follows: 68.5% of male students had multiple sex partners while 33.6% of female students did. More than one million adolescent girls get pregnant in the United States each year. Besides the pregnancy problem, the teenagers are facing risks of having various STDs, including AIDS. Being the focus of some studies, the majority of young adolescents had sexual behavior and often had multiple sex partners without the habit of using condoms. Again, in the United States, the number of females with HIV positive is increasing rapidly, with the rate of more than 75% in 1994 (CDC, 1995),and was once soaring up to 80% in 2000( CDC, 2003). Having sexual contacts with male HIV positives is the major cause (38%), and vein drug injection is another cause (20%) (CDC, 2003). In order to lower the incidence of HIV, people need to have safer sex. Using the condom correctly throughout the sex act has been known as the way to prevent AIDS, STDs and unexpected pregnancy (Forrest, 1990). However, the use of condoms is not popular. Hillman (1992) found in his study that only 28% of teenagers used condoms during the first intercourse. Only 57% of 17-year old boys and 45% of 17-year old girls in west Canada used condoms in their recent sexual intercourse (Health Canada, 1996). Richardson, Beagley, Delaney and Langille(1997) revealed that more boy students(54%) than girl students(34%) used condoms in sexual activities, and condoms were more frequently used by students of the 13-15 age level, among which boys had a more apparent negative attitude in using condoms than girls. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it