MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045234139 · doi:10.1080/16184742.2020.1793376

The effects of health, social, and consumption capital on running-related expenditures in China

2020· article· en· W3045234139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Sport Management Quarterly · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Planning Office of Philosophy and Social ScienceBeijing Municipal Commission of Education
KeywordsEndogeneityConsumption (sociology)Social capitalDemographic economicsInstrumental variableEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research question: This study investigates the effects of health, social, and consumption capital on running-related expenditures. It adds to previous research by empirically testing investment in the stock of health on participation-related expenditures.Research methods: Chinese amateur runners (n=6,693) were surveyed on health capital (i.e. health change since taking up running), social capital (i.e. running group participation), consumption capital (i.e. sport profiles), socio-demographics, and running-related expenditures over a one-year period. Two instrumental variables reflecting life domain satisfaction were included to address the endogeneity of health change.Results and findings: Results show that variables capturing health, social, and consumption capital significantly affect total running-related expenditures, whereas the effects on expenditure categories vary. After taking endogeneity into account, the results show that health change since taking up running positively affects total running-related expenditures and sport apparel expenses.Implications: The findings provide empirical support for Downward et al.’s (2009) general economic model of sports consumption by revealing that health, social, and consumption capital are significant drivers of participation-related expenditures. While mass participation, health, and economic objectives may be achieved concurrently, policy makers should carefully balance these objectives. Sport managers and marketers can use mass participant sport events to stimulate continued participation, and this in turn generates health, social, and consumption capital that drives expenditures. Fostering running group participation increases expenditures. Early career runners should be targeted for sport apparel. Cross-promotion among related sports may increase overall sport consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it