MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust INS/GPS Coupled Navigation Based on Minimum Error Entropy Kalman Filtering

2020· article· en· W3045675901 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceGPS/INSEntropy (arrow of time)Control theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceAssisted GPSTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the results showing the expanded use or improvement of the accuracy, availability, and/or integrity performance of multisensory navigation systems. In addition, Processing algorithms and methods for multisensory systems are significantly improved when noises are non-Gaussian. In the literature, different modified linear and nonlinear Kalman filters (KFs) were derived under the Gaussian assumption and the well-known minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion. In order to improve their robustness with respect to impulsive non-Gaussian noises, different algorithms and techniques based on Gaussian sum filtering, Huber based estimators and recently introduced maximum Correntropy criterion (MCC) have recently been used to counter the weakness of the MMSE criterion in developing different versions of robust Kalman filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it