MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Migrating Intelligence from Cloud to Ultra-Edge Smart IoT Sensor Based on Deep Learning: An Arrhythmia Monitoring Use-Case

2020· article· en· W3045727878 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkEdge computingCloud computingMachine learningEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFeature extractionArtificial neural networkReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditionally, the Internet of Things (IoT) devices, deployed on the ultra-edge of the network, lack computation, and energy resources. In this paper, we press on the need to go beyond the realms of traditional edge computing (e.g., limited to user-smartphones) and investigate how to incorporate intelligence into the ultra-edge IoT sensors. Among numerous use-cases, we select a mobile Health (mHealth) scenario where we conceptualize a smart IoT sensor to collect and intelligently process single-channel Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals to detect arrhythmia, a heart-condition often associated with morbidity and even mortality. The arrhythmia detection can be regarded as a non-linear Delay Differential Equation (DDE) time-series analysis problem, and the conventional solutions to this problem are not suitable for integration with IoT sensors due to rigorous pre-processing steps. As a solution, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based, lightweight Arrhythmia classification system is proposed in the paper without the need for noise-filtering and feature extraction steps. Four classes of the heartbeats are considered to comply with the ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998 standard. The proposed system's performances and generalization potential are assessed using three datasets from PhysioNet trained on a deep learning workstation and then transferred to virtualized micro-controllers connected to IoT sensors. The proposed deep learning model exhibits encouraging performance (accuracy 95.27%) in heartbeat classification. Experimental and numerical results demonstrate that the proposed deep learning technique outperforms conventional DDE-based optimization techniques and machine learning techniques such as K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and random forest (RF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207