MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045754159 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3012907

MVFCC: A Multi-View Fuzzy Consensus Clustering Model for Malware Threat Attribution

2020· article· en· W3045754159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityCluster analysisAttributionMalwareFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise of emerging cyberthreats has led to a shift of focus on identifying the source of threat instead of the type of attack to provide a more effective defense to compromised environments against malicious acts. The most complex type of cyberthreat is the Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) attack that is usually backed by one or more states and lunched using a range of clandestine techniques aiming at high-value targets. Finding the source of the attackers and the associated campaign behind the threats can lead to taking an optimum defense decision in a more timely fashion. Threat attribution is an act of attributing an attack to the source of the attack. Threat attribution can not be fully achieved by a single piece of evidence (i.e. single view) from malicious actors as the evidence could get obfuscated by the actor to evade the detection mechanism. In this article, we propose a multi-view fuzzy consensus clustering model for attributing cyber threat payloads (malware) to its actor. We conduct over 4000 experiments to find out the best combinations of all 12 extracted views for the attribution task. Our experiments use five well-know APT families payloads. To avoid bias in the results, we apply a fuzzy pattern tree and multi-modal fuzzy classifier for our inference engines of all views. To define an optimum distinction among the malicious actor's behavior we implemented the consensus clustering technique. The comparison analysis of a single-view versus multi-view result justifies a significant improvement in the accuracy rate of attribution for all actors. The obtained results from the multi-view aspect of our proposed model give 95.2% accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it