La querella de las cosas. Marx, Lucrecio y el desorden del mundo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de una lectura centrada en On the Nature of Marx’s Things. Translation as Necrophilology, el siguiente artículo intenta situar la lectura de Marx desarrollada por su autor, Jacques Lezra, tanto en el contexto de sus demás contribuciones relativas a un materialismo salvaje, como en el contexto de los actuales debates sobre nuevos materialismos y ontologías orientadas al objeto. La referencia lucreciana de Lezra permite activar lo que Althusser llamó una corriente subterránea de materialismo aleatorio, cuestión que no sólo problematiza el materialismo histórico convencional, sino la dialéctica materialista y su origen hegeliano. En efecto, subyace tanto a su libro sobre Marx, como a sus demás monografías una lectura fuerte de Lucrecio y su De Rerum Natura, cuestión clave para comprender la singularidad de sus aproximaciones al problema de la traducción, de la mercancía, de la filología negativa y, sobre todo, de un republicanismo no normativo ni soberanista, constituido por instituciones defectivas y abiertas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it