La querella de las cosas. Marx, Lucrecio y el desorden del mundo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de una lectura centrada en On the Nature of Marx’s Things. Translation as Necrophilology, el siguiente artículo intenta situar la lectura de Marx desarrollada por su autor, Jacques Lezra, tanto en el contexto de sus demás contribuciones relativas a un materialismo salvaje, como en el contexto de los actuales debates sobre nuevos materialismos y ontologías orientadas al objeto. La referencia lucreciana de Lezra permite activar lo que Althusser llamó una corriente subterránea de materialismo aleatorio, cuestión que no sólo problematiza el materialismo histórico convencional, sino la dialéctica materialista y su origen hegeliano. En efecto, subyace tanto a su libro sobre Marx, como a sus demás monografías una lectura fuerte de Lucrecio y su De Rerum Natura, cuestión clave para comprender la singularidad de sus aproximaciones al problema de la traducción, de la mercancía, de la filología negativa y, sobre todo, de un republicanismo no normativo ni soberanista, constituido por instituciones defectivas y abiertas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".