MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W304629260

Online Lending Circles Hit Circuit Breaker: What Will Possible SEC Regulation Mean for P-to-P Lenders, a Rising Bank Competitor-And Potential Partner?

2008· article· en· W304629260 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueABA banking journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCredit cardRevenueMonetary economicsFinancial systemPaymentFinanceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Websites that help individuals make loans to other individuals online suddenly have been stopped their meteoric rise, calling into question whether such sites are the easy antidote to the current credit crisis. Collectively, site operators such as Prosper, Zopa, Virgin Money, GlobeFunder, and Lending Club tend to be termed for person-to-person lending. However, some reject that label, partly, it seems, to distance themselves from subprime, and now tarnish coming over the pto-p niche. Micro lending is another term for the practice, although that term has more often been used reference to loans made to the poor developing countries. We know what happened to peer-to-peer music sites, like Napster, which enjoyed explosive growth at the start of this decade: Lawmakers shut them down. While p-to-p lenders may not be facing something so drastic, April's announcement by Lending Club that it was ceasing to take lender applications pending a process to register with the appropriate securities authorities begs the question what the future of p-to-p will be. With the music sites, record companies were hemorrhaging revenues from songs that would have been sold, instead being shared for free online. contrast, with p-to-p loans, the upstarts have taken maybe just $250 million of the $400 billion now funded by credit cards. However, with the initial p-to-p defaults running one case near 20% market generally jittery about bad loans; with unsophisticated financial players (consumers) involved; and with uncertainty about where the buck stops, greater scrutiny now is not too surprising. A regulatory At the heart of the knot is whether p-to-p sites issue loans or securities. Typically, loans made on these sites are subdivided between many parties, so the $20,000 borrower gets has been advanced by ten individual lenders, each with $2,000 stake. subdividing or syndication makes it less like simple loan and more like structured debt instrument, or security. The U.S. securities law is very clear on this: if you have segment of consumer loan, then it is security, says Doug Dolton, chief executive of Zopa, which operates differently the U.S. than the U.K., precisely for that reason. The whole world of p-to-p lending, we're finding, is not simple, Dolton notes. A Canadian site and Dutch site have been shut down, he adds, and in the U.K., we had to carve out new category [with regulators]. Asheesh Advani, chief executive of Virgin Money, which operates similarly on both sides of the Atlantic--servicing pre-arranged private loans that are not subdivided--says, By design, we've avoided the minefield from the beginning. Lending Club could not take press calls during its mandatory quiet period with the SEC. Prosper, the biggest, true p-to-p lender (both Zopa and Virgin say they are not that category) said it filed an SI with the SEC last October and referred ABA BJ to statement issued after Lending Club's hiatus, noting that Prosper believes it is, structured... compliance with applicable state and federal laws. Banking law specialist Walt Moeling, partner Powell Goldstein LLP, Atlanta, says, If the SEC said 'you have to register as securities broker,' I don't think these sites could function. It is possible for bona fide loans, even when they are shared, to be distinguished from securities, he says, but factors considered include the financial sophistication of the parties involved and how tailored the offers are. The more it looks like 'take it or leave it' the more it looks like security, Moeling says Asked whether SEC regulation would kill the p-to-p model, Jim Bruene, former banker who is now editor and publisher of the e-zine NetBanker, said, Certainly, it's huge barrier to entry but my speculation is that it won't kill it. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it