MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046471202 · doi:10.21272/bel.4(2).56-74.2020

Business Open Big Data Analytics to Support Innovative Leadership and Management Decision in Canada

2020· article· en· W3046471202 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nadia Delanoy, Karina Kasztelnik

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness Ethics and Leadership · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataBusiness intelligenceBusiness analyticsAnalyticsSocial media analyticsKnowledge managementSocial mediaData scienceCrowdsourcingComputer scienceCultural analyticsSemantic analyticsBusinessBusiness modelWorld Wide WebMarketingBusiness analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper summarizes how social media and other technologies continue to proliferate; the shifting economic landscape will precipitate more adaptive approaches for managers attempting to understand the multi-dimensional virtual aspects of communication with the artificial intelligence aspect. Also, we discover the different existing support of big data analytics to make a rational business decision. The methodology is the systematization literature sources within this context and approaches for the underlining approach to open big data analytics and support innovative leadership decisions in Canada. The paper is carried out in the following logical sequence to gain an understanding of how customer relations managers could utilize social media within a data analytics frame from scholar and practitioner perspectives. This literature research review original paper outlines the main themes including the role of social media, the experiences of using data analytics for customer relations management, and the notion that customer-centric technologies could change the dynamic of understanding customer intentions, leadership decisions and introduce the innovative management with using the big data analytics in place. The results of the critical thinking with analysis both authors can be useful for any business around the World that would like to start using Artificial Intelligence to support innovative management decisions. The emergent themes that were highlighted based on the realities of customer relations management may be significant to how the integration of social media feedback resulting from crowdsourcing in addition to existing data analytics could better position organizations in this evolving world. The implications of linking innovative management processes such as demographic analysis, platform understanding, and communication methods together are crucial for any public business with a global impact. Finally, the understanding of innovation management in a social media era and understanding how customers utilized open big data analytics sources could help leadership practices across industries around the World. Keywords: Big Data Analytics, Innovative Leadership, Management of Social Media, Open Sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.713
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBusiness Ethics and LeadershipSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207