MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046734871 · doi:10.1145/3377929.3398124

Colour quantisation using self-organizing migrating algorithm

2020· article· en· W3046734871 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsSomaComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Palette (painting)Artificial intelligenceTask (project management)Set (abstract data type)PopulationProcess (computing)Image (mathematics)AlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colour quantisation is a common image processing technique to reduce the number of distinct colours in an image. Selecting these colour, which comprise a colour palette, is a challenging task since they determine the resulting image quality. In this paper, we propose a novel colour quantisation algorithm based on the Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm (SOMA), in particular, SOMA Team To Team Adaptive (SOMA T3A), a recent variant of SOMA. SOMA T3A works, iteratively in three phases, namely organization, migration, and update, and performs adaptive parameter definition. Migrants are selected from the population and move towards a leader during the organization process. Experimental results on a benchmark set of images show excellent colour quantisation performance and our approach to outperform several conventional and soft-computing-based colour quantisation algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207