MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047796933 · doi:10.3390/s20164411

Control System for Vertical Take-Off and Landing Vehicle’s Adaptive Landing Based on Multi-Sensor Data Fusion

2020· article· en· W3047796933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitLanding gearSensor fusionComputer scienceRobotAdaptive controlEngineeringSimulationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicles (VTOL UAV) are widely used in various fields because of their stable flight, easy operation, and low requirements for take-off and landing environments. To further expand the UAV's take-off and landing environment to include a non-structural complex environment, this study developed a landing gear robot for VTOL vehicles. This article mainly introduces the adaptive landing control of the landing gear robot in an unstructured environment. Based on the depth camera (TOF camera), IMU, and optical flow sensor, the control system achieves multi-sensor data fusion and uses a robotic kinematical model to achieve adaptive landing. Finally, this study verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of adaptive landing through experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it