MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047861058 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.3014870

Bringing Intelligence to Software Defined Networks: Mitigating DDoS Attacks

2020· article· en· W3047861058 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDenial-of-service attackDomain Name SystemComputer networkComputer securityApplication layer DDoS attackServerThe InternetScalabilityBotnetSoftware-defined networkingTrinooOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the most devastating types of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, Domain Name System (DNS) amplification attack represents a big threat and one of the main Internet security problems to nowadays networks. Many protocols that form the Internet infrastructure expose a set of vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to carry out a set of attacks. DNS, one of the most critical elements of the Internet, is among these protocols. It is vulnerable to DDoS attacks mainly because all exchanges in this protocol use User Datagram Protocol (UDP). These attacks are difficult to defeat because attackers spoof the IP address of the victim and flood him with valid DNS responses coming from legitimate DNS servers. In this paper, we propose an efficient and scalable solution, called WisdomSDN, to effectively mitigate DNS amplification attack in the context of software defined networks (SDN). WisdomSDN covers both detection and mitigation of illegitimate DNS requests and responses. WisdomSDN consists of: (1) a novel proactive and stateful scheme (PAS) to perform one-to-one mapping between DNS requests and DNS responses; it operates proactively by sending only legitimate responses, excluding amplified illegitimate DNS responses; (2) a machine learning DDoS detection module to detect, in real-time, illegitimate DNS requests. This module consists of (a) Flow statistics collection scheme (FSC) to gather the features of flows in an efficient and scalable way using sFlow protocol; (b) Entropy calculation scheme (ECS) to measure randomness of network traffic; and (c) Bayes Network based Filtering scheme (BNF) to classify, based on entropy values, illegitimate DNS requests; and (3) DNS Mitigation scheme (DM) to effectively mitigate illegitimate DNS requests. The experimental results show that, compared to state-of-art, WisdomSDN can effectively detect/mitigate DNS amplification attack quickly with high detection rate, less false positive rate, and low overhead making it a promising solution to mitigate DNS amplification attack in a SDN environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it