Improved Vehicle LiDAR Calibration With Trajectory-Based Hand-Eye Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In unmanned vehicles, LiDARs and GPS/INSs are the most popular sensors to achieve perception and positioning. Precise calibration of the extrinsic parameters between the LiDAR and the GPS/INS is necessary for a successful implementation of sensor fusion. The extrinsic transformation between the LiDAR and GPS/INS is 6D ($x$,$y$,$z$,$yaw$,$pitch$,$roll$), but the motion of a vehicle is mainly 3D ($x$,$y$,$yaw$). The problem is to calculate the 6D extrinsic parameters with the limitation of 3D motion (plane constraint). The solution to this problem has been breaking the plane constraint by designing specific vehicle motions. This paper proposes a new method, a trajectory-based hand-eye calibration method, which makes full use of the large range of unmanned vehicles. The trajectories with large and small ranges are used to solve the rotation and translation, respectively. It is proved that the extrinsic parameters can be solved when the trajectory range of the unmanned vehicle is sufficiently large. The method proposed is tested with simulation, custom and KITTI datasets, and compared with the state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrate that the accuracy and efficiency of the method proposed are comparable to the state of the art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".