Accelerate the Promotion of Mobile Payments during the COVID-19 Epidemic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 is caused by a novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). During the COVID-19 epidemic, when people are infected with the virus, they can transmit the virus onto paper or coin money through touch and droplets, potentially making any physical currency a carrier of the virus. Although there is no report confirming that people can become infected with viruses by cash circulation, relevant research on the survival of viruses on solid surfaces supports this hypothesis. Mobile payments can help individuals avoid coming in direct contact with any paper or coin money. Therefore, we strongly recommend the promotion of mobile payments during the COVID-19 epidemic. COVID-19 is caused by a novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). During the COVID-19 epidemic, when people are infected with the virus, they can transmit the virus onto paper or coin money through touch and droplets, potentially making any physical currency a carrier of the virus. Although there is no report confirming that people can become infected with viruses by cash circulation, relevant research on the survival of viruses on solid surfaces supports this hypothesis. Mobile payments can help individuals avoid coming in direct contact with any paper or coin money. Therefore, we strongly recommend the promotion of mobile payments during the COVID-19 epidemic. COVID-19 is caused by a novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2).1Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. (2020). Geneva: World Health Organ ization, https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/.Google Scholar So far, COVID-19 has caused a worldwide epidemic. According to the WHO report, as of August 13, 2020, about 20.44 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with the virus, and more than 744,300 people worldwide have died.2World Health Organization (WHO)WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard.https://covid19.who.int/Date: 2020Google Scholar The transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 include droplet transmission, contact with contaminated surfaces, inhalation of virus droplets, aerosol transmission, and close contact with infected people.3National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Division of Viral DiseasesHow COVID-19 spreads.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/transmission. htmlDate: 2020Google Scholar When the infected person coughs or sneezes, the droplets fall on the surface of an object to form a surface contamination.4Ong S.W.X. Tan Y.K. Chia P.Y. Lee T.H. Ng O.T. Wong M.S.Y. Marimuthu K. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient.JAMA. 2020; 323: 1610-1612Crossref PubMed Scopus (1568) Google Scholar In addition, a recent study has shown that SARS-CoV-2 can survive for 72 h on plastic and stainless steel surfaces; 4 h on copper surfaces; and 24 h on paper surfaces.5Doremalen N.V. Bushmaker T. Morris D.H. Holbrook M.G. Gamble A. Williamson B.N. Tamin A. Harcourt J.L. Thornburg N.J. Gerber S.I. et al.Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1.N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 382: 1564-1567Crossref PubMed Scopus (6789) Google Scholar During the COVID-19 epidemic, when people are infected with the virus, they can transmit the virus onto paper or coin money through touch and droplets, potentially making any physical currency a carrier of the virus. During cash circulation, the virus may be spread among individuals, which increases the chance of people becoming infected by the virus. Although there is no report confirming that people can become infected with viruses by cash circulation, relevant research on the survival of viruses on solid surfaces supports this hypothesis.5Doremalen N.V. Bushmaker T. Morris D.H. Holbrook M.G. Gamble A. Williamson B.N. Tamin A. Harcourt J.L. Thornburg N.J. Gerber S.I. et al.Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1.N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 382: 1564-1567Crossref PubMed Scopus (6789) Google Scholar In a previous study, when human influenza viruses are deposited on banknotes, they can survive for several days and remain infectious, and high concentrations of virus and respiratory mucus can extend the duration of viral infections.6Thomas Y. Vogel G. Wunderli W. Suter P. Witschi Mark. Koch Daniel. Tapparel C. Kaiser L. Survival of influenza virus on banknotes.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008; 74: 3002-3007Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar Under natural conditions, after the nasopharyngeal secretions of 14 influenza patients (influenza A [H3N2] virus culture-positive) were inoculated onto the surface of banknotes, seven cases of influenza virus survived for at least 24 h and five cases survived for at least 48 h. In a particular case, the influenza virus maintained its ability to infect cells for 12 days. In addition, human rhinoviruses HRV2 and HRV37 were tested on banknotes without respiratory mucus; HRV2 survived for 48 h and HRV37 survived for more than 120 h.6Thomas Y. Vogel G. Wunderli W. Suter P. Witschi Mark. Koch Daniel. Tapparel C. Kaiser L. Survival of influenza virus on banknotes.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008; 74: 3002-3007Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar These results provided potential evidence that cash can be used as a viral vector. At the same time, with the availability of the internet and the development of technology, along with the popularity of smartphones, mobile payments can help individuals avoid coming in direct contact with any paper or coin money. This direction is promising for reducing viral transmission, as well as reducing the risk of promoting the spread of COVID-19. Although some countries have made great progress in mobile payment systems, many people still use cash in public places, such as in supermarkets and cafeterias. In 2019, American consumers used cash payments 15 times a month on average, and the proportion of in-person retail payments made in cash in a typical month was 30%.7Foster K. Greene C. Stavins J. The 2018 survey of consumer payment choice: summary results. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Research Data Reports.https://www.frbatlanta.org/-/media/documents/banking/consumer-payments/survey-of-consumer-payment-choice/2019/2019-survey-of-consumer-payment-choice.pdfDate: 2019Google Scholar According to the statistics of the Japanese Bankers Association in 2019, 73% of Japanese use cash for daily person-to-person transactions.8Fujiki H. The use of noncash payment methods for regular payments and the household demand for cash: evidence from Japan.Jpn. Econ. Rev. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-020-00049-5Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar In addition, a survey conducted by the Bank of Canada in 2020 indicates that 74% of Canadians expect to continue using cash payments in the next few years.9Chen H. Engert W. Huynh K. Nicholls G. Nicholson M. Zhu J.L. Cash and COVID-19: the impact of the pandemic on demand for and use of cash.https://www.Bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/sdp2020-6.pdfDate: 2020Google Scholar However, mobile payments can be used in an increasing number of transaction scenarios in China. In 2019, the utilization rate of mobile payments in China reached 86%, making China the country with the highest mobile payment penetration rate in the world.10Yin Z.C. Gong X. Guo P.Y. Wu T. What drives entrepreneurship in digital economy? Evidence from China.Econ. Model. 2019; 82: 66-73Crossref Scopus (144) Google Scholar Today, many countries around the world are fighting COVID-19. The social distancing and non-contact prevention methods have exhibited a certain effect in slowing the spread of COVID-19. Therefore, we strongly recommend the promotion of mobile payments during the COVID-19 epidemic. We are grateful to Bahareldin Ali Abdalla for helping with language editing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it