C-Space tunnel discovery for puzzle path planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rigid body disentanglement puzzles are challenging for both humans and motion planning algorithms because their solutions involve tricky twisting and sliding moves that correspond to navigating through narrow tunnels in the puzzle's configuration space (C-space). We propose a tunnel-discovery and planning strategy for solving these puzzles. First, we locate important features on the pieces using geometric heuristics and machine learning, and then match pairs of these features to discover collision free states in the puzzle's C-space that lie within the narrow tunnels. Second, we propose a Rapidly-exploring Dense Tree (RDT) motion planner variant that builds tunnel escape roadmaps and then connects these roadmaps into a solution path connecting start and goal states. We evaluate our approach on a variety of challenging disentanglement puzzles and provide extensive baseline comparisons with other motion planning techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it