MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049131949 · doi:10.1002/qre.2726

Design of a variable sampling interval exponentially weighted moving average median control chart in presence of measurement errors

2020· article· en· W3049131949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality and Reliability Engineering International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEWMA chartControl chartStatisticsChartCovariateX-bar chartObservational errorMathematicsInterval (graph theory)Statistical process controlSampling intervalSampling (signal processing)Variable (mathematics)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmControl (management)Process (computing)Artificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the literature, many control charts monitoring the median is designed under a perfect condition that there is no measurement error. This may make the practitioners confusing to apply these control charts because the measurement error is the true problem in practice. In this paper, we consider the effect of measurement error on the performance of the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart combining with the variable sampling interval (VSI) strategy. A linear covariate error model is supposed to model the measurement error. The performance of the VSI EWMA median control chart is evaluated through the average time to signal. The numerical simulation shows that the measurement errors have a negative influence on the proposed chart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it