MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049399255 · doi:10.1093/fs/knaa138

<i> Histoire des traductions en langue française, <scp>xx</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle: 1914–2000 </i> . Sous la direction de <scp>Bernard Banoun</scp> , <scp>Isabelle Poulin</scp> et <scp>Yves Chevrel</scp> <i> Histoire des traductions en langue française, <scp>xx</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle: 1914–2000 </i> . Sous la direction de BanounBernard, PoulinIsabelle et ChevrelYves. Paris: Verdier, 2019. 1920 pp., ill.

2020· article· fr· W3049399255 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn Batchelor

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipNarrativeHistoryPeriod (music)HumanitiesFifteenthArt historyClassicsArtLiteraturePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the fourth volume of the Histoire des traductions en langue française (HTLF). The first, covering the nineteenth century, was published in 2012; further volumes covering the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries followed in 2014 and 2016. Altogether the project represents an astounding labour of scholarship and international collaboration, completed over a relatively short time period. The HTLF sets itself the ambitious goal of observing the role played by translations in all areas of intellectual enquiry. Around 40 per cent of the volume under review is devoted to literary translation, and a further 40 per cent is shared between other areas, such as opera, cinema, religion, philosophy, history, anthropology, and the sciences. The remainder of the volume is taken up with contextualizing essays by leading translation theorists, and includes a history of traductologie, a field of research which — like translation studies in the UK — has come into its own since the 1970s. These rough percentages give an indication of the balance and scope of the volume, and the range of readers for whom it will no doubt become a vital resource. Far from being an enumeration of translated publications, the HTLF is a series of carefully constructed historical narratives, based on a critical approach to primary sources, and alert to the silences and biases within those narratives. In the chapter on the sciences, for example, the authors sketch out broad trajectories of translation activity against the backdrop of changing trends in language use in scientific publications, but note that any account that is based on written documents and bibliographic research overlooks the significance of what they term ‘invisible’ translation activity. By this they mean translations which circulate in unpublished form, or as annexes to original works, or, towards the end of the century, via simultaneous interpretation at major international conferences. Throughout the volume, there is a concern to shine a light on translators, ‘trop longtemps invisible’ (p. 7). Thus one of the contextualizing chapters is devoted to the translation profession and translator education; there is an index of translators as well as an index of authors; feature boxes offer biographical accounts of individual translators such as Vladimir Nabokov (pp. 815–16); names of translators are systematically included in the historical accounts, and are supplemented on occasion with further details about their other publications or activities. Considerable attention is also given to the crucial role played by patrons and editors in determining translation selection. Geographically, the focus of the volume is on the major francophone spaces of the West — France, Canada, Belgium, Switzerland. Temporally, the volume ends, as its title indicates, in the year 2000; only one of the chapters (on feminism and gender studies) extends in-depth discussion into the early decades of the twenty-first century. From the perspective of today’s technology-imbued world, there is already a sense on reading this ‘final’ HTLF volume (p. 7) that a history of the first decades of the twenty-first century needs to follow not long behind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207