Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the context is not an unusual topic within education programs, there is a notable lack of systematic investigation regarding the daily experiences of school counselors among counselor educators (DeBlassie & Ludeman, 1973; jeffery, Lehr, Hache, & Campbell, 1992; Sutton, Southworth, & Pearson, 1990). Sutton and Southworth (1990) contended that despite the need to learn more about education issues and effective delivery systems, systematic investigation regarding the concerns of school counselors was minimal. Almost a decade later, this scenario remains unchanged. This situation is disconcerting when considering the lack of information that is available to prospective school counselors in academic programs (Murray & Keller, 1991) and the significant role that school counselors can play in the lives of children (e.g., Mustaine, LaFountain, & Pappalardo, 1993). Realizing that counseling students are about to embark on a career involving unique cultural demands, the need for specialized instruction and related research becomes apparent (McIntire, Marion, & Quaglia, 1990). The purpose of this article is to provide information that can potentially inform counselor educators, practicing professionals, and aspiring counselors. To this end, this article provides a comprehensive review of the school counselor literature, elaborates on the findings of a qualitative study, discusses implications for the counseling profession, and suggests directions for future research. Literature Review A literature review revealed an abundance of information regarding school counseling. Pron-dnent issues affecting these professionals, although primarily based on personal impressions, were isolation, boundary spanning activities, and community pressures. Specific information regarding how these issues directly relate to the personal lives and work experiences of school counselors follows. Isolation Feelings of isolation may be experienced by school counselors on both a personal and professional level. Sutton (1988) reported that counselor anxiety regarding the need for personal boundaries may result in social withdrawal and ultimately contribute to increased isolation. The lack of a natural support system can leave counselors coping with feelings of loneliness. Fear of isolation, however, can prompt counselors to extend themselves to others. Poor road conditions, hazardous terrain, and the distance between communities and urban centers (McLesky, Huebner, & Cummings, 1984) can limit a counselor's access to social activities and preclude communication with and stimulation and support by other professionals. Consequently, counselors may have a thinner, social-support network in contrast to their urban counterparts. DeBlassie and Ludeman (1973) remarked that the majority of school counselors rarely exchange ideas with colleagues and have little opportunity for professional growth. Helge (1981) reported that these limitations are the major reason why young professionals leave positions. The difficulty counselors experience integrating into the community may also contribute to a sense of isolation (Murray, 1984). Their situation is likened to being a stranger in a strange land (Benson, Hanson, & Canfield, 1982). Huebner and Huberty (1984) and Marrs (1984) noted that urban professionals who relocate to settings often experience culture shock and are likely to leave at the first opportunity. Findings by Sutton (1988) are supported by McIntire et al., (1990), who stated that, rural guidance professionals are often the only trained counselors in their schools and even in their districts (p. 169). Consequently, appropriate supervision may not be forthcoming when a principal or superintendent also serves as a counselor's direct supervisor. Sutton and Southworth (1990) discovered that 90% of all school counselors in Maine were supervised by their principal or another administrator. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".