DELPHI: accurate deep ensemble model for protein interaction sites prediction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Proteins usually perform their functions by interacting with other proteins, which is why accurately predicting protein-protein interaction (PPI) binding sites is a fundamental problem. Experimental methods are slow and expensive. Therefore, great efforts are being made towards increasing the performance of computational methods. RESULTS: We propose DEep Learning Prediction of Highly probable protein Interaction sites (DELPHI), a new sequence-based deep learning suite for PPI-binding sites prediction. DELPHI has an ensemble structure which combines a CNN and a RNN component with fine tuning technique. Three novel features, HSP, position information and ProtVec are used in addition to nine existing ones. We comprehensively compare DELPHI to nine state-of-the-art programmes on five datasets, and DELPHI outperforms the competing methods in all metrics even though its training dataset shares the least similarities with the testing datasets. In the most important metrics, AUPRC and MCC, it surpasses the second best programmes by as much as 18.5% and 27.7%, respectively. We also demonstrated that the improvement is essentially due to using the ensemble model and, especially, the three new features. Using DELPHI it is shown that there is a strong correlation with protein-binding residues (PBRs) and sites with strong evolutionary conservation. In addition, DELPHI's predicted PBR sites closely match known data from Pfam. DELPHI is available as open-sourced standalone software and web server. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The DELPHI web server can be found at delphi.csd.uwo.ca/, with all datasets and results in this study. The trained models, the DELPHI standalone source code, and the feature computation pipeline are freely available at github.com/lucian-ilie/DELPHI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it