DELPHI: accurate deep ensemble model for protein interaction sites prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Proteins usually perform their functions by interacting with other proteins, which is why accurately predicting protein-protein interaction (PPI) binding sites is a fundamental problem. Experimental methods are slow and expensive. Therefore, great efforts are being made towards increasing the performance of computational methods. RESULTS: We propose DEep Learning Prediction of Highly probable protein Interaction sites (DELPHI), a new sequence-based deep learning suite for PPI-binding sites prediction. DELPHI has an ensemble structure which combines a CNN and a RNN component with fine tuning technique. Three novel features, HSP, position information and ProtVec are used in addition to nine existing ones. We comprehensively compare DELPHI to nine state-of-the-art programmes on five datasets, and DELPHI outperforms the competing methods in all metrics even though its training dataset shares the least similarities with the testing datasets. In the most important metrics, AUPRC and MCC, it surpasses the second best programmes by as much as 18.5% and 27.7%, respectively. We also demonstrated that the improvement is essentially due to using the ensemble model and, especially, the three new features. Using DELPHI it is shown that there is a strong correlation with protein-binding residues (PBRs) and sites with strong evolutionary conservation. In addition, DELPHI's predicted PBR sites closely match known data from Pfam. DELPHI is available as open-sourced standalone software and web server. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The DELPHI web server can be found at delphi.csd.uwo.ca/, with all datasets and results in this study. The trained models, the DELPHI standalone source code, and the feature computation pipeline are freely available at github.com/lucian-ilie/DELPHI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".