MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080501404 · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000002717

The Five-step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined

2020· article· en· W3080501404 on OpenAlexaff
Rod J. Rohrich, Ira L. Savetsky, Yash J. Avashia

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlepharoplastyMedicineEyelidSurgeryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Lower lid blepharoplasty is one of the most complex procedures performed by plastic surgeons. Here we provide a comprehensive and systematic approach to the lower eyelid, which is critical for lower lid blepharoplasty success. PREOPERATIVE PLANNING A thorough ophthalmic history must be taken, specifically as it relates the to use of corrective lenses, glaucoma, allergic reactions, excess tearing, and dry eyes.1 No periorbital aesthetic surgery should take place within 6 months of refractory surgery. Evaluation should include facial proportions, skin type, skin excess, snapback, palpebral fissure size/shape, fat herniation, tear trough, canthal position, extraocular muscle function, Bell’s phenomenon, levator function, margin reflex distance, brow and eyelid ptosis, and globe position relative to malar prominence. (See Video 1 [online], which displays facial analysis.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 1.","caption":"Facial analysis. Video 1 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_5yaho5cr"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE Step 1: Deep Malar Fat Compartment Augmentation Fat is injected into the deep malar space from the alar base as an entry point, using a 2-mm blunt single side–hold cannula approximately one fingerbreadth below the orbital rim, correcting malar deflation and the inverted-V deformity.2,3 (See Video 2 [online], which displays deep malar fat compartment augmentation.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 2.","caption":"Step 1: Lower Blepharoplasty Technique. Video 2 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_mm1jgcd8"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Step 2: Transconjunctival Removal of Lower Lid Fat (If Indicated) Only a small amount of fat is removed, proceeding from the medial to the lateral side, in most cases. In general, the amount of fat removed decreases as you proceed from the lateral to the medial. The lateral deep lower eyelid fat tends to be fuller, more robust, and more vascular. The lateral fat pad is also most likely to be missed.2,3 (See Video 3 [online], which displays transconjunctival removal of lower lid fat.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 3.","caption":"Step 2: Lower Blepharoplasty Technique. Video 3 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_1linvs8d"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Step 3: Lateral Retinacular Canthopexy An absorbable 5-0 Vicryl (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.) suture is used for the lateral canthopexy to prevent scleral show and lower-lid malposition without affecting the long-term lateral canthal shape. A 5-0 Mersilene (Ethicon, Inc.) suture may be necessary in men with secondary lax eyelids, in cases of dry eyes, and in negative vector patients.2,3 (See Video 4 [online], which displays lateral retinacular canthopexy.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 4.","caption":"Step 3: Lower Blepharoplasty Technique. Video 4 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_dccgm5s2"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Step 4: Skin Pinch Removal Fine forceps are used to pinch the excess skin, creating a linear partition to be excised. Curved scissors are then used to carefully excise the skin, maintaining the underlying orbicularis muscle.2,3 (See Video 5 [online], which displays skin pinch removal.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 5.","caption":"Step 4: Lower Blepharoplasty Technique. Video 5 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_fvlf3416"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Step 5: Fractionated Fat Injection and Release of the Orbicularis-Retaining Ligament Fat is harvested from the inner thigh with a small multiport cannula. The harvested fat is centrifuged for no more than 1 minute, with the supranatant and infranatant discarded. The remaining fat is then run through a tulip connector at least 50 times to allow for fractionation. This leads to fragmentation of adipose tissue structure. Using a fine 1-mm cannula with a single port, fractionated fat is injected above the periosteum and below the muscle with 50% overcorrection. The medial portion of the orbicularis-retaining ligament needs to be released from its maxillary attachments to blend this transition zone. Release is gently performed laterally using the same fine 1-mm cannula in a blunt manner in the supraperiosteal plane.4,5 (See Video 6 [online], which displays fractionated fat injection and release of the orbicularis-retaining ligament.) {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 6.","caption":"Step 5: Lower Blepharoplasty Technique. Video 6 from “The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty Technique Refined”","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"0_672si7w2"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} CONCLUSION A comprehensive and systematic ophthalmic history and examination is critical in establishing goals and formulating a precise surgical plan for lower blepharoplasty. PATIENT CONSENT Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207