MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080939175 · doi:10.1117/12.2566486

Bringing together graduate students and companies to solve industry-related problems in optics and photonics

2020· article· en· W3080939175 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philippe Guay, Olivier-Michel Tardif, Lauris Talbot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCompetitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Event (particle physics)Work (physics)Product (mathematics)Process (computing)Graduate studentsComputer scienceEngineeringSociologyMechanical engineeringMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the last fifteen years, Universite Laval’s SPIE Student Chapter has been building strong links between academia and industry to better prepare its student members to face their future career and to guide them towards industry. With now over fifty companies working in the field of optics and photonics in the Quebec City area alone, this makes it one of the best places in the world for students to visit companies and learn about companies’ expertise, equipment and work environments. In 2017 and for the first time at Universite Laval, the Student Chapter organized a day-long workshop where students had to solve real-world industry-related problems presented by high-end optics-related companies, i.e. an industrial seminar. Now at its fourth edition, a retrospective picture investigating the success of this event can be drawn. Over the years, more than 20 companies from Quebec City’s rich optics and photonics area were invited to present their domain of expertise to students through conferences, product demonstrations and original problem scenarios encountered in the past. As a result, no fewer than 100 students were familiarized with the work of these technology companies. They also exchanged and shared ideas with expert engineers, physicists, chemists, etc., and were given real-world problems to solve. From this process, direct links were created between the employers and the future employees, and a clearer picture was drawn for graduates envisioning an industrial career. Consequently, this event has shown to be beneficial for both students and companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0170.006
Open science0.0040.025
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCompetitive and Knowledge IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207