MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081405700 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2020.3019437

Distributed Intelligence: A Verification for Multi-Agent DRL-Based Multibeam Satellite Resource Allocation

2020· article· en· W3081405700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationResource management (computing)Reinforcement learningScheduleScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationComputer networkCommunications satelliteComputational complexity theoryBroadbandSatelliteTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centralized radio resource management method puts all of the computational burdens in an agent, which is unbearable with the increasing of data dimensionality. This letter focuses on how to schedule limited satellite-based radio resources efficiently to enhance transmission efficiency and extend broadband coverage with low complexity. We propose a cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (CMDRL) framework to achieve the radio resources management strategy. The bandwidth allocation problem is taken as an example to analyze the proposed novel method in simulation. The experimental results show that this approach is capable of enhancing transmission efficiency and be flexible to achieve the desired goal with low complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it