MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081405700 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2020.3019437

Distributed Intelligence: A Verification for Multi-Agent DRL-Based Multibeam Satellite Resource Allocation

2020· article· en· W3081405700 on OpenAlexaff
Xianglai Liao, Xin Hu, Zhijun Liu, Shijun Ma, Lexi Xu, Xiuhua Li, Weidong Wang, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationResource management (computing)Reinforcement learningScheduleScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationComputer networkCommunications satelliteComputational complexity theoryBroadbandSatelliteTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centralized radio resource management method puts all of the computational burdens in an agent, which is unbearable with the increasing of data dimensionality. This letter focuses on how to schedule limited satellite-based radio resources efficiently to enhance transmission efficiency and extend broadband coverage with low complexity. We propose a cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (CMDRL) framework to achieve the radio resources management strategy. The bandwidth allocation problem is taken as an example to analyze the proposed novel method in simulation. The experimental results show that this approach is capable of enhancing transmission efficiency and be flexible to achieve the desired goal with low complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207