MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081875647 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2020.3021145

CoMP Transmission in Downlink NOMA-Based Heterogeneous Cloud Radio Access Networks

2020· article· en· W3081875647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsTelecommunications linkUser equipmentComputer scienceNomaTransmission (telecommunications)Spectral efficiencyComputer networkCloud computingInterference (communication)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionRadio access networkData transmissionChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsBase stationMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the integration between the coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmission and the non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in downlink heterogeneous cloud radio access networks (H-CRANs). In H-CRAN, low-power high-density small remote radio heads (SRRHs) are underlaid by high-power low-density macro RRH (MRRH). However, co-channel deployment of the different RRHs gives rise to the problem of inter-cell interference that significantly affects system performance especially the cell-edge users. Thus, the users are first categorized into Non-CoMP users and CoMP users based on the relation between the useful signal to the dominant interference signal. The Non-CoMP user is the user equipment (UEs) having high signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (INR) and hence associates with only one RRH. On the other hand, the CoMP user, cell-edge user, is the UE that experiences less distinctive received power with the best two RRHs. In the proposed CoMP-NOMA framework, each RRH schedules CoMP-UE and non-CoMP-UE over the same transmission channel using NOMA. We first design an analytical framework based on tools from the stochastic geometry to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework (CoMP-NOMA) which is based on H-CRAN in terms of the average achievable data rate for each NOMA UE. We then examine the spectral efficiency of the proposed CoMP-NOMA based H-CRAN. Simulation results are provided to validate the accuracy of the analytical models and to reveal the superiority of the proposed CoMP-NOMA framework compared with conventional CoMP orthogonal multiple access (CoMP-OMA) techniques. By reaping the benefits of both JT-CoMP and NOMA, we prove that the proposed framework can successfully deal with the inter-cell interference by using CoMP and improve the network's spectral efficiency through NOMA technique. We also show that, with an appropriate power allocation coefficient setting at the Non-CoMP-UEs, a fairness performance can be achieved between the CoMP-UEs and the Non-CoMP-UEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it