MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082086559 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2020.3020139

Distributed Data-Driven Intrusion Detection for Sparse Stealthy FDI Attacks in Smart Grids

2020· article· en· W3082086559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceState (computer science)Smart gridIntrusionElectric power systemData centerData miningReal-time computingDistributed computingPower (physics)Computer networkAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stealthy false data injection (FDI) attacks in smart grids can bypass the bad data detection, and thus make an incorrect state estimate in the control center. In this brief, a distributed data-driven intrusion detection approach is proposed to reveal the existence of the sparse stealthy FDI attack in a multi-area interconnected power system. The proposed distributed intrusion detection approach avoids the over-fitting issue that is extensively seen when implementing machine learning algorithms for large-scale systems. Firstly, each area estimates the entire system state based on a distributed state estimation algorithm. Then, the state of each local area is used as trained neural network input to detect the stealthy FDI attacks. Simulation results on the IEEE 118-bus system verify that the proposed method not only reduces the risk of over-fitting, but also can locate the areas which have been attacked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it