MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT161: Phase I clinical trials of SLC-0111, a novel inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase IX, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020· article· en· W3083093525 on OpenAlexaff
Paul C. McDonald, Stephen Chia, Philippe L. Bédard, Qunicy Chu, Michael P. A. Lyle, Liren Tang, Madhu Singh, Zaihui Zhang, Claudiu T. Supuran, Daniel J. Renouf, Shoukat Dedhar

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme function and inhibition
Canadian institutionsSignalChem (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer CentreWelichem Biotech (Canada)Spinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsNauseaAdverse effectPharmacokineticsInternal medicineOncologyPharmacologyVomitingCancerDiscontinuationClinical trialPhases of clinical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a cell surface, HIF-1A-inducible enzyme that is highly expressed in many solid tumors, is considered to be an endogenous marker of hypoxia and is a prominent biomarker of poor patient prognosis. In contrast, CAIX expression in normal human normal tissue is highly restricted, making it an attractive therapeutic target and driving the development of CAIX-specific inhibitors. SLC-0111 is an ureido-substituted benzenesulfonamide small molecule inhibitor of CAIX. We have shown previously that targeting CAIX activity with SLC-0111, alone and in combination with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade, results in anti-tumor efficacy in multiple solid tumor models in vivo. Here, we report the findings of a multi-center, open-label, first-in-human phase I clinical trial investigating the safety and tolerability of SLC-0111 in patients with previously treated, advanced solid tumors (NCT02215850). Using a 3+3 design, dose escalation started at 500 mg oral daily dosing of SLC-0111 in cohort 1 and increased to 1000 mg and 2000 mg in cohorts 2 and 3. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were monitored to determine safety and tolerability. Pharmacokinetic analyses assessed plasma concentrations of single and repeated doses of SLC-0111. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess disease progression. No DLTs were reported and patients dosed at 1000 mg and below exhibited fewer drug-related AEs ≥ grade 3 and fewer AEs such as nausea and vomiting, compared to the 2000 mg cohort. 41% of patients experienced dose interruptions or discontinuation and the majority (71%) of these occurred in the 2000 mg cohort. Mean Cmax and AUC(0-24) values for single doses were similar at the 1000 mg and 2000 mg dose levels. Mean Tmax and T1/2 values of SLC-0111 were similar after single and repeated dosing. Power-law analysis of Cmax and AUC(0-24) showed that exposure to SLC-0111 was generally dose proportional. No objective responses were observed, but stable disease greater than 24 weeks was observed in 2 patients. These data show that SLC-0111 is safe in patients and support 1000 mg/day as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Based on these encouraging results, a phase Ib clinical trial to evaluate SLC-0111 in combination with chemotherapy in a defined population of CAIX-positive pancreatic cancer patients (NCT03450018) is now open and future clinical development will include investigation of SLC-0111 in combination with chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. Citation Format: Paul C. McDonald, Stephen Chia, Philippe L. Bedard, Qunicy Chu, Michael Lyle, Liren Tang, Madhu Singh, Zaihui Zhang, Claudiu T. Supuran, Daniel J. Renouf, Shoukat Dedhar. Phase I clinical trials of SLC-0111, a novel inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase IX, in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT161.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicEnzyme function and inhibitionFrench-language works237,207