A Deep Multiscale Spatiotemporal Network for Assessing Depression From Facial Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, deep learning models have been successfully employed in many video-based affective computing applications (e.g., detecting pain, stress, and Alzheimer’s disease). One key application is automatic depression recognition – recognition of facial expressions associated with depressive behaviour. State-of-the-art deep learning algorithms to recognize depression typically explore spatial and temporal information individually, by using 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to analyze appearance information, and then by either mapping facial feature variations or averaging the depression level over video frames. This approach has limitations in terms of its ability to represent dynamic information that can help to accurately discriminate between depression levels. In contrast, models based on 3D CNNs allow to directly encode the spatio-temporal relationships, although these models rely on temporal information with fixed range and single receptive field. This approach limits the ability to capture variations of facial expression with diverse ranges, and the exploitation of diverse facial areas. In this article, a novel 3D CNN architecture – the Multiscale Spatiotemporal Network (MSN) – is introduced to effectively represent facial information related to depressive behaviours from videos. The basic structure of the model is composed of parallel convolutional layers with different temporal depths and sizes of receptive field, which allows the MSN to explore a wide range of spatio-temporal variations in facial expressions. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that our MSN architecture is effective, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in automatic depression recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".