Virtual Service Placement for Edge Computing Under Finite Memory and Bandwidth
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edge computing allows an edge server to adaptively place virtual instances to serve different types of data. This article presents a new algorithm which jointly optimizes virtual service placement farsightedly and service data admission instantly to maximize the time-average service throughput of edge computing. The data admission is optimized, adapting to fast-changing data arrivals and wireless channels. The service placement is transformed into a two-dimensional knapsack problem by approximating future arrivals and channels with past observations, and solved over a slow timescale to allow services to be properly installed. Different from existing studies, our algorithm considers practical aspects of edge servers, such as finite memory size and bandwidth. We prove that the algorithm is asymptotically optimal and the optimality loss resulting from the approximation diminishes. Simulations show that our approach can improve the time-average throughput of existing alternatives by 16% for our considered simulation setup. The improvement becomes higher, as the memory size becomes increasingly tight. The number of services to be replaced is reduced without loss of throughput, after being placed farsightedly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it