Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apparently, the war in Syria is coming to an end. The reincarnation project of the classical caliphate under the banner of the “Islamic State” has failed completely. The internal political opposition which rebelled against the ruling regime in the midst of the so-called “Arab Spring” agreed with the idea that there was simply no alternative figure capable of replacing B. Assad. The international sponsors of the Syrian opposition have also changed their attitude towards official Damascus and do not intend to spend further billions of dollars on operations to remove the Syrian leader. This article is an attempt to find answers to more urgent and topical issues for Syria that arise now: where to find great sums of money to restore the destroyed social and economic infrastructure of the country? How to solve the urgent problem of millions of Syrian refugees and temporarily displaced persons? What reforms are needed to avoid new bloodshed and recurrence of the events of the recent past? The author analyzes geopolitical and socio-economic consequences of the unfinished war. Particular attention is paid to the problems of Syrian refugees in other countries and internally displaced persons in Syria itself. The article emphasizes that the task of the reconstruction of Syria is complicated by the fact that this country has not yet been able to restore its territorial integrity and security in some areas. In addition, the recovery process is hampered as a result of the existing economic and financial sanctions imposed on Syria by the European Union, USA, Canada, Australia, Turkey, and the UN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".