MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084667464 · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000001277

A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology of Congenital Syphilis in the United States From 1980 to 2019

2020· review· en· W3084667464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Diseases · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsMedicineEpidemiologySyphilisPregnancyPrenatal careObservational studyIncidence (geometry)Risk factorObstetricsCongenital syphilisPediatricsFamily medicineEnvironmental healthPopulationHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Congenital syphilis (CS) is the result of antepartum transmission from mother to fetus of the spirochete Treponema pallidum. Although preventable through timely screening and treatment, the incidence of CS in the United States is increasing. This review describes the epidemiological trends in CS in the United States from 1980 to 2019 and characteristics of mothers of infants with CS. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of epidemiological studies of CS following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. Quality and bias of included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies that described the demographics and characteristics of pregnant women with syphilis or who delivered an infant with CS in the United States were identified from PubMed and Embase. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2771 studies, of which 309 were selected for further review and 27 were included in the final analysis. Substance use during pregnancy was a risk factor for CS in 16 studies. Maternal cocaine use was described in 11 of the 16 studies, 10 of which were published between the years 1980 and 1999. No prenatal care was a risk factor for CS in 17 studies. Evidence of inadequate syphilis testing (i.e., no maternal screen, first screen after the first trimester, or no repeat screen in third trimester) or treatment (i.e., no treatment, treatment <30 days before delivery, or nonpenicillin treatment) was significantly associated with CS in 13 studies. Finally, higher rates of CS were reported among African American women in 11 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Infection with and antepartum transmission of syphilis disproportionately affect certain subgroups of women. Women who report substance use during pregnancy are more likely to give birth to an infant with CS. No prenatal care and evidence of inadequate syphilis testing and treatment during pregnancy are also significantly associated with giving birth to an infant with CS. Finally, cases of CS disproportionately affect African American women. Addressing the CS epidemic will require identification and targeted allocation of resources to communities at elevated risk for syphilis, removal of barriers to prenatal care, and ensuring timely treatment and adequate partner notification of identified cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it