Smart and Green Mobility Management for 5G‐enabled Vehicular Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary With the recent demand of sustainable and green smart cities, we are witnessing a growing research initiative toward the development of efficient energy‐aware 5G/Wifi‐6 wireless networks. This has led to the development of what is referred to as the Internet of Energy‐based technology to support heterogeneous and complex wireless systems such as intelligent vehicular network and smart connected cities as well as efficiently manage their available energy resources. Towards this end, the next generation of 5G/Wifi‐6 wireless network technologies shall provide a practical platform to support green Internet of vehicular networks, smart transportation systems, and smart cities. In this context, the management of vehicles' mobility and communication protocol needs to be fully investigated, adapted and reconfigured to better fit the power consumption and the energy resources' limitations of the next generation of intelligent vehicular networks. In this article, we present the latest mobility management protocols designed for 5G‐enabled vehicular networks, discuss their efficiency, their design, and their drawbacks. We point out the main characteristics, components, and limitation of mobility management protocols and wireless access. Last, but not least, we discuss several open issues, followed by future research directions toward the design and development of mobility management schemes for the next generation of green 5G and beyond enabled vehicular networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it