MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088030513 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.3026581

Torque Performance Enhancement in Consequent Pole PMSM Based on Magnet Pole Shape Optimization for Direct-Drive EV

2020· article· en· W3088030513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorque rippleTorque densityTorqueControl theory (sociology)MagnetDirect torque controlStall torqueComputer scienceRotor (electric)Electromagnetic coilPhysicsVoltageMechanical engineeringEngineeringInduction motor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing a permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) for direct-drive electric vehicle (EV) has challenges such as obtaining high torque density and low torque ripple. The PMSM should have high pole numbers owing to low-speed operation, thereby increasing the use of rare earth magnets and cost. Therefore, in this article a consequent pole (CP) rotor topology is proposed in which the permanent magnet (PM) volume is reduced when compared with conventional surface PMSM (SPMSM). However, replacing south poles in an SPMSM with induced steel poles can increase torque ripple and reduce torque density. In order to improve torque density in a CP PMSM, structural modifications such as multilayer windings and non-ferromagnetic barriers have been proposed in the literature. These modifications increased the torque density while increasing the torque ripple. Therefore, this article proposes a novel two-level optimization method based on gradient descent algorithm, to address the challenges of improving torque density and reducing torque ripple simultaneously in a CP PMSM. Initially, an expression for the magnet pole arc angle is derived for CP PMSM based on magnetic equivalent circuit. A two-level optimization is performed on a baseline CP PMSM to determine the optimal magnet pole arc. The torque production and torque ripples of the optimized design are validated by simulation and experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it