MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088095465 · doi:10.1080/17517575.2020.1820583

IoTPulse: machine learning-based enterprise health information system to predict alcohol addiction in Punjab (India) using IoT and fog computing

2020· article· en· W3088095465 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A.P. Dhillon, Ashima Singh, Harpreet Vohra, Caroline Ellis, Blesson Varghese, Sukhpal Singh Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueEnterprise Information Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceInternet of ThingsLatency (audio)Fog computingQuality of serviceReal-time computingEmbedded systemComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes IoT-based an enterprise health information system called IoTPulse to predict alcohol addiction providing real-time data using machine-learning in fog computing environment. We used data from 300 alcohol addicts from Punjab (India) as a case study to train machine-learning models. The performance of IoTPulse is compared against existing work using various parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision which shows improvement of 7%, 4%, 12% and 12%, respectively. Finally, IoTPulse is validated in FogBus-based real fog environment using QoS parameters including latency, network bandwidth, energy and response time which improves performance by 19.56%, 18.36%, 19.53% and 21.56%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnterprise Information SystemsSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207