Achieve Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Disease Risk Assessment Over Multi-Outsourced Vertical Datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is believed that online disease risk assessment system has great potential to alleviate the medical treatment problems for the future smart city and communities, as it can excavate disease risk factors from a large number of patient features, provide diagnostic references for doctors, and save medical treatment time for patients. However, the flourish of online disease risk assessment service still faces severe challenges including information privacy and security. In this article, based on the naïve Bayesian classification, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving diseaserisk assessment scheme over multi-outsourced vertical datasets, named CARER. With CARER, the e-healthcare provider can securely train a disease risk predication model over vertically distributed medical data from multiple medical centers (i.e., hospitals), and provide privacy-preserving disease risk predication services for users (i.e., patients and doctors). During the model training and disease risk prediction phases, all sensitive data are operated over ciphertexts without decryption. As a result, the private information of medical centers, e-healthcare provider, and users can be well protected. Detailed security analysis shows that CARER can resist various known security threats. In addition, we evaluate the performance of CARER with real medical datasets, and the results demonstrate that CARER is efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".