MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088656166 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.09.027

Commentary: Should surgeons challenge the unknown sequela of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus?

2020· letter· en· W3088656166 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequelaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Coronavirus2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicBetacoronavirusDiseaseVirusMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)PathologyOutbreakPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageThoracic surgeons must carefully consider the indications and precautions for surgical procedures in patients with COVID-19. An excellent outcome was seen after a post-COVID-19 tracheal resection.See Article page 360. Thoracic surgeons must carefully consider the indications and precautions for surgical procedures in patients with COVID-19. An excellent outcome was seen after a post-COVID-19 tracheal resection. See Article page 360. In the early 2020, the World Health Organization declared a global outbreak of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), and the situation was classified as an international emergency.1McKay B. Calfas J. Ansari T. Coronavirus declared pandemic by World Health Organization.https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-coronavirus-cases-top-1-000-11583917794Date accessed: August 25, 2020Google Scholar Throughout the world, health care systems were forced to adopt changes to their practices and deal with a highly contagious and lethal virus. At the forefront of this pandemic, thoracic surgeons face challenges not only in defining the indications for life-saving procedures in patients with COVID-19 but also in adopting new tactics to safely perform surgery in infected, highly contagious patients. As thoracic surgeons treat patients during this pandemic, data are being generated related to the risks and efficacy of surgical procedures in infected patients as well as in patients with sequelae of COVID-19 infection. The crude mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 can reach 4.3%.2Wang D. Hu B. Hu C. Zhu F. Liu X. Zhang J. et al.Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China.JAMA. 2020; 323: 1061-1069Crossref PubMed Scopus (16387) Google Scholar Strikingly, the postoperative mortality rate for infected patients who undergo thoracic surgery may be 10 times greater than that of patients without COVID-19 (27% vs 2%).3Peng S. Huang L. Zhao B. Zhou S. Braithwaite I. Zhang N. et al.Clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 in 11 patients after thoracic surgery and challenges in diagnosis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 160: 585-592.e2Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar Given this scenario, the decision to proceed with elective major surgical procedures in patients infected with or recovering from COVID-19 should be, at a minimum, questioned. In this issue of JTCVS Techniques, Lucchi and colleagues4Lucchi M. Ambrogi M. Aprile V. Ribechini A. Fontanini G. Laryngotracheal resection for a post-tracheotomy stenosis in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 360-364Scopus (11) Google Scholar from the University of Pisa in Italy elegantly detail a courageous surgical repair of a tracheal stenosis that developed as a sequela of COVID-19. A complex cervical tracheoplasty was performed with good results in the patient, who was recovering from COVID-19 infection and underwent open tracheostomy during hospitalization for COVID-19. During the pandemic, 10% of infected patients in need of respiratory support have required invasive mechanical ventilation,5Şentürk M. El Tahan M.R. Szegedi L.L. Marczin N. Karzai W. Shelley B. et al.Thoracic anesthesia of patients with suspected or confirmed 2019 novel coronavirus infection: preliminary recommendations for airway management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020; 34: 2315-2327Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar and of those, 8% to 13% have undergone tracheostomy.6Tay J.K. Khoo M.L. Loh W.S. Surgical considerations for tracheostomy during the COVID- 19 pandemic: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 146: 517-518Crossref PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar Not surprisingly we are now dealing with increase rates of tracheal stenosis, as the orotracheal tube and the tracheostomy are known risk factors for tracheal stenosis. The authors, however, speculate that airway inflammation induced by the COVID-19 virus can also lead to laryngotracheal stenosis.7Bassi M. Anile M. Pecoraro Y. Ruberto F. Martelli S. Piazzolla M. et al.Bedside transcervical transtracheal post-intubation injury repair in a Covid-19 patient.Ann Thorac Surg. April 22, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar Many techniques have been described to minimize tracheal manipulation and the risk of aerosolization of the virus. The percutaneous approach developed by the physician team at NYU Langone Health deserves special mention as a good and safe alternative.8Angel L. Kon Z.N. Chang S.H. Rafeq S. Shekar S.P. Mitzman B. et al.Novel percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients with COVID-19.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110: 1006-1011Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (135) Google Scholar Although the authors suggest that meticulous surgical technique during tracheostomy might reduce the risks of stenosis as a post-tracheostomy complication, in this case, the pathology report revealed changes in the resected tracheal segment. This may explain future stigmas in the airways of patients with respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation.4Lucchi M. Ambrogi M. Aprile V. Ribechini A. Fontanini G. Laryngotracheal resection for a post-tracheotomy stenosis in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 360-364Scopus (11) Google Scholar Little is known about the duration, impact, and subsequent recovery from COVID-19. Today, we are facing an invisible enemy, an airborne pathogen that can affect the patient and the surgeon throughout the investigation and treatment period. Although major airway surgery creates an ideal environment for infection of the surgical team, tracheal stenosis can cause severe airway obstruction, and resection may be the only curative option. In this patient, aggressive screening for COVID-19 in the perioperative period and meticulous patient selection were critical to achieve good results. We can't recommend elective major airway surgery in patients with COVID-19; however, the authors have shown that it is possible to accomplish an outstanding result while taking all necessary precautions. Laryngotracheal resection for a post-tracheotomy stenosis in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)JTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly spread worldwide since the first reported case1–3 in Wuhan, China. Patients who need hospitalization for respiratory support require, in about 10% of cases, oro-tracheal intubation (OTI) for invasive ventilation and a tracheotomy whenever the patient is intubated for a long time and the prognosis is good.4 Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it