Dynamic Data Science Applications in Optimal Profit Algorithmic Trading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many of the challenges and opportunities of data science in finance involve recursive smoothing, forecasting, filtering and pattern mining. Recently there has been a growing interest in using filtered estimates for dynamic hedge ratios for pairs trading. Moreover, rolling estimates and forecasts are used for pattern mining in technical analysis. Kalman filtering algorithms were successfully applied in pairs trading with only two co-integrated assets. In this paper, pairs trading strategy is extended to multiple trading (with more than two assets) strategy. Recently proposed non-Gaussian maximum informative filtering algorithms for dynamic state space models are used to obtain the filtered estimates of hedge ratios and applied in multiple trading. It is shown that the proposed multiple trading strategy outperforms (with higher profits) the commonly used pairs trading strategy using real data. A data-driven approach for selecting a parameter which maximizes the Sharpe ratio (SR) to generate optimal trading signals is also discussed in some detail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it