MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088894617

Pascal's Triangle and the Kesten-McKay Law

2020· preprint· en· W3088894617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjacency matrixMathematicsRandom walkAdjacency listCombinatoricsPascal (unit)GraphRandom graphDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kesten-McKay law describes the number of closed walks on a regular tree or, equivalently, the expected eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of a random regular graph. It is a widely studied and heavily used distribution. We show that the moments of the Kesten-McKay law can be generated by the truncation of Pascal's triangle. As introduced by Kesten and later by McKay, these laws were indexed by the degree of a regular graph. However the parameter can be any positive real number even though there is no longer an associated random walk or graph. Nevertheless, we show that our triangle rule remains valid in the continuous case. Thus, we obtain a new stochastic process which we call the Kesten-McKay process. Using free independence, we give an explicit realization of the process using random matrices. Along the way we will introduce many of the standard distributions (the 'Lego blocks') of free probability. By enabling the reader to play with these distributions, we hope to entice the reader into the new world of free probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.074 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it