MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089223520 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.14267

P‐130: A Full Screen Biometric Identification Approach for OLED Displays by Using Near‐Infrared OLED

2020· article· en· W3089223520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubpixel renderingOLEDThin-film transistorPixelComputer scienceOptoelectronicsBiometricsMaterials scienceResponsivityLayer (electronics)Computer visionPhotodetectorNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a full screen biometric identification approach for organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays using a near infra‐red(NIR) OLED coupled to a large area thin film transistor (TFT) pixel sensing circuit. Preliminary estimates for photons propagating from the NIR OLED source and reflecting back to the subpixel are presented. Although the signal landing on the subpixel is small, it may be amplified by the large area active pixel sensor circuits integrated in the TFT layer. The proposed approach has the key advantage of compatibility with existing large area fabrication processes. Although there are still some open technical issues such as NIR OLED lifetime, responsivity and sensor characteristics, the proposed approach demonstrates the potential to implement a full screen biometric identification within a large area display.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it