MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089728503 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2020397118

Inference of dynamic systems from noisy and sparse data via manifold-constrained Gaussian processes

2021· preprint· en· W3089728503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOdeGaussian processInferenceComputer scienceManifold (fluid mechanics)Nonlinear systemBayesian inferenceOrdinary differential equationMathematical optimizationStatistical inferenceGaussianConstraint (computer-aided design)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsBayesian probabilityMathematicsArtificial intelligenceDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Ordinary differential equations are a ubiquitous tool for modeling behaviors in science, such as gene regulation, biological rhythms, epidemics, and ecology. An important problem is to infer and characterize the uncertainty of parameters that govern equations. We present an accurate and fast inference method using manifold-constrained Gaussian processes, such that derivatives of the Gaussian process must satisfy the dynamics of the differential equations. Our method completely avoids the use of numerical integration and is thus fast to compute. Our construction is embedded in a principled statistical framework and is demonstrated to yield fast and reliable inference in a variety of practical problems. Our method works even when some system components are unobserved, which is a significant challenge for previous methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it