MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Inherent Robustness of a New Approach to Adaptive Control

2020· article· en· W3089913002 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Adaptive controlEstimatorUpper and lower boundsRobust controlExponential stabilityExponential functionMathematicsAdaptive estimatorComputer scienceControl systemControl (management)EngineeringNonlinear systemMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently it has been shown how to carry out adaptive control for an LTI plant so that the effect of the initial condition decays exponentially to zero and so that the input-output behavior enjoys a convolution bound. This, in turn, has been leveraged to prove, in several special cases, that the closed-loop system is robust in the sense that both of these properties are maintained in the presence of a small amount of parameter time-variation and unmodelled dynamics. The goal of this paper is to show that this robustness property is true for a general adaptive controller which may include multi-estimators; the immediate ramification is that if we are able to prove exponential stability and a convolution bound for the case of fixed plant parameters, then robustness comes for free.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it