MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091041214 · doi:10.1007/s11242-020-01479-w

On the Modelling of Immiscible Viscous Fingering in Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media

2020· article· en· W3091041214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransport in Porous Media · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergi SimulationHeriot-Watt University
KeywordsViscous fingeringPorous mediumViscosityThermodynamicsViscous liquidTwo-phase flowMechanicsMaterials scienceFlow (mathematics)Computer sciencePorosityPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Viscous fingering in porous media is an instability which occurs when a low-viscosity injected fluid displaces a much more viscous resident fluid, under miscible or immiscible conditions. Immiscible viscous fingering is more complex and has been found to be difficult to simulate numerically and is the main focus of this paper. Many researchers have identified the source of the problem of simulating realistic immiscible fingering as being in the numerics of the process, and a large number of studies have appeared applying high-order numerical schemes to the problem with some limited success. We believe that this view is incorrect and that the solution to the problem of modelling immiscible viscous fingering lies in the physics and related mathematical formulation of the problem. At the heart of our approach is what we describe as the resolution of the “ M - paradox ”, where M is the mobility ratio, as explained below. In this paper, we present a new 4-stage approach to the modelling of realistic two-phase immiscible viscous fingering by (1) formulating the problem based on the experimentally observed fractional flows in the fingers, which we denote as $$ f_{\rm w}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and which is the chosen simulation input; (2) from the infinite choice of relative permeability (RP) functions, $$ k_{\rm rw}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>rw</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> and $$ k_{\rm ro}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ro</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , which yield the same $$ f_{\rm w}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , we choose the set which maximises the total mobility function, $$ \lambda_{\text{T}}^{{}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> (where $$ \lambda_{\text{T}}^{{}} = \lambda_{\text{o}}^{{}} + \lambda_{\text{w}}^{{}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), i.e. minimises the pressure drop across the fingering system; (3) the permeability structure of the heterogeneous domain (the porous medium) is then chosen based on a random correlated field (RCF) in this case; and finally, (4) using a sufficiently fine numerical grid, but with simple transport numerics. Using our approach, realistic immiscible fingering can be simulated using elementary numerical methods (e.g. single-point upstreaming) for the solution of the two-phase fluid transport equations. The method is illustrated by simulating the type of immiscible viscous fingering observed in many experiments in 2D slabs of rock where water displaces very viscous oil where the oil/water viscosity ratio is $$ (\mu_{\text{o}} /\mu_{\text{w}} ) = 1600 $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1600</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Simulations are presented for two example cases, for different levels of water saturation in the main viscous finger (i.e. for 2 different underlying $$ f_{\rm w}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> functions) produce very realistic fingering patterns which are qualitatively similar to observations in several respects, as discussed. Additional simulations of tertiary polymer flooding are also presented for which good experimental data are available for displacements in 2D rock slabs (Skauge et al., in: Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 14–18 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, SPE-154292-MS, 2012. 10.2118/154292-MS , EAGE 17th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2013; Vik et al., in: Presented at SPE Europec featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, SPE-190866-MS, 2018. 10.2118/190866-MS ). The finger patterns for the polymer displacements and the magnitude and timing of the oil displacement response show excellent qualitative agreement with experiment, and indeed, they fully explain the observations in terms of an enhanced viscous crossflow mechanism (Sorbie and Skauge, in: Proceedings of the EAGE 20th Symposium on IOR, Pau, France, 2019). As a sensitivity, we also present some example results where the adjusted fractional flow ( $$ f_{\rm w}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> ) can give a chosen frontal shock saturation, $$ S_{\rm wf}^{*} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>wf</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , but at different frontal mobility ratios, $$ M(S_{\rm wf}^{*} ) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>wf</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Finally, two tests on the robustness of the method are presented on the effect of both rescaling the permeability field and on grid coarsening. It is demonstrated that our approach is very robust to both permeability field rescaling, i.e. where the ( k max / k min ) ratio in the RCF goes from 100 to 3, and also under numerical grid coarsening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it