MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091567099 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3027536

Intelligent Trust-Based Public-Key Management for IoT by Linking Edge Devices in a Fog Architecture

2020· article· en· W3091567099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingServerComputer networkRevocation listAuthentication (law)Computer securityEdge computingKey managementKey (lock)Public-key cryptographyPublic key infrastructureEncryptionOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to memory and processing limitations, Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices require external fog servers to perform some of their tasks. However, this offloading of tasks comes at the cost of more interactions whose security cannot be guaranteed without the authentication and key management scheme. Traditional prescriptions, such as those used for securing the Web, require referring to central agents, such as certificate authorities (CA) or online certificate status protocol (OCSP) responders, that sit in the cloud. This poses many challenges, including additional communication costs and repetitive delays which work against the low latency and energy efficiency goals of edge networking. In this article, we propose a novel semidecentralized public-key management scheme for smart IoT systems in which devices intelligently decide whether to look for the keying material locally at the edge or refer to the cloud for this purpose. The result is a security architecture that links IoT devices, fog servers, and cloud, but with minimal dependency on the latter. In the proposed solution, devices work collaboratively to deliver revocation lists and digital certificates of fog servers to each other. The decision to go for edge nodes or cloud CA/OCSP responders is made intelligently by each node upon learning its neighborhood and network statistics. The core idea is based on the Web of trust, but unlike that, whenever a material is not found locally, cloud servers are queried. Experiments show that through this intelligent approach, the cost of key management operations, e.g., delay, can be reduced by up to 50%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it