MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091853659 · doi:10.1080/19236026.2020.1752068

Evaluation of the effects of diesel oxidation catalysts on NO<sub>2</sub> emissions from diesel-powered mining vehicles

2020· article· en· W3091853659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIM Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsVale (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel fuelDiesel particulate filterDiesel exhaustAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceDiesel exhaust fluidCatalysisDiesel engineWaste managementBusinessEngineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Diesel-powered vehicles, particularly those equipped with oxidation catalysts (diesel oxidation catalysts, DOCs) are one of the major contributors to concentrations of toxic NO2 in underground mines. Potentially, the adverse effects of catalysts on NO2 emissions could result in higher exposures to NO2. In this study, 16 in-service DOCs supplied by various mining operations and five new DOCs with advanced catalyst formation supplied by manufacturers were tested. The testing took place at the CanmetMINING Diesel Research Laboratory in Ottawa; and was executed following two types of protocols: progressive load test (PLT) and vehicle transient test (VTT). The VTT consisted of four cycles that simulated operation of a load-haul-dump (LHD) vehicle, pickup truck, utility vehicle, and tractor. The DOCs were tested in a controlled laboratory environment using a single engine coupled to a dynamometer. The laboratory gas analyzers were used to characterize gaseous emissions including carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitric oxide (NO), oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), and total hydrocarbons (THCs). DOCs with three different types of catalyst formulations were evaluated during this study: (1) platinum group (group 1); (2) base metal/palladium (group 2) group; and (3) “advanced” group (group 3). All DOCs were found to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) and total hydrocarbon emissions. However, the change in NO2 (g/kWh) emissions over the VTT ranged from an increase of 446% to a reduction of 47%. In general, the increase in NO2 emission was much higher than the reduction for the in-use groups 1 and 2 DOCs; where the advanced group 3 DOCs saw an average reduction of NO2 (g/kWh) emissions by 73% (range from 47% to 94%). Therefore, advanced formulation DOCs designed for NO2 suppression are recommended for use in underground mines. The PLT provided emission conversion efficiencies for tested DOCs over the wide engine operating temperature range which can be used to estimate the effects of DOC emissions of a particular vehicle when operated over actual mine duty cycles. This paper discusses the study approach and test results of changes in NO2-specific emissions from DOCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it