An efficient algorithm for Elastic I‐optimal design of generalized linear models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The generalized linear models (GLMs) are widely used in statistical analysis and the related design issues are undoubtedly challenging. The state‐of‐the‐art works mostly apply to design criteria on the estimates of regression coefficients. The prediction accuracy is usually critical in modern decision‐making and artificial intelligence applications. It is of importance to study optimal designs from the prediction aspects for GLMs. In this work, we consider Elastic I‐optimality as a prediction‐oriented design criterion for GLMs, and develop an efficient algorithm for such EI‐optimal designs. By investigating theoretical properties for the optimal weights of any set of design points and extending the general equivalence theorem to the EI‐optimality for GLMs, the proposed efficient algorithm adequately combines the Fedorov–Wynn algorithm and the multiplicative algorithm. It achieves great computational efficiency with guaranteed convergence. Numerical examples are conducted to evaluate the feasibility and computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it