MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092413731 · doi:10.47655/dialog.v34i1.149

REFLEKSI UNTUK MODERASI ISLAM-INDONESIA

2017· article· en· W3092413731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialog · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndonesianIslamPolitical radicalismTerrorismViolent extremismMedia studiesPolitical scienceGender studiesPsychologySociologyHistoryLawPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This reflective article describes the author's experience of the common attitude of Indonesian Muslims who are basically uncourageous and afraid of murder, violence, terrorism, radicalism, or the like. Indonesian Muslims prefer to moderate attitude than extreme one. Therefore, Indonesian Muslims--both individual and communal-- will always be moderate from the first onwards. Both experiences while living abroad (Canada) and notably in the country (Indonesia) proved to the author that Indonesian Muslims did not like violence. Moreover, the evidences suggested that the source of violence is external influence. One of related experiences on how Indonesian Muslims abroad tend to avoid violence was also experienced by the author during his lecture at McGill University, Montreal, Canada. In this article the author sketches briefly his story and conclude that the basic characteristics of Indonesian Muslims is moderate, and moderate Muslim trends or movements will be well acceptable and grow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it