MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092415961 · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnaa033

Modelling the impact of structural directionality on connectome-based models of neural activity

2020· article· en· W3092415961 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amelia Padmore, M. R. Nelson, Nadia Chuzhanova, Jonathan J. Crofts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Complex Networks · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsConnectomeAttractorDirectionalityComputer scienceConnectomicsNeuroscienceRobustness (evolution)Modularity (biology)Artificial neural networkNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Artificial intelligenceFunctional connectivityBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding structure--function relationships in the brain remains an important challenge in neuroscience. However, whilst structural brain networks are intrinsically directed, due to the prevalence of chemical synapses in the cortex, most studies in network neuroscience represent the brain as an undirected network. Here, we explore the role that directionality plays in shaping transition dynamics of functional brain states. Using a system of Hopfield neural elements with heterogeneous structural connectivity given by different species and parcellations (cat, Caenorhabditis elegans and two macaque networks), we investigate the effect of removing directionality of connections on brain capacity, which we quantify via its ability to store attractor states. In addition to determining large numbers of fixed-point attractor sets, we deploy the recently developed basin stability technique in order to assess the global stability of such brain states, which can be considered a proxy for network state robustness. Our study indicates that not only can directed network topology have a significant effect on the information capacity of connectome-based networks, but it can also impact significantly the domains of attraction of the aforementioned brain states. In particular, we find network modularity to be a key mechanism underlying the formation of neural activity patterns, and moreover, our results suggest that neglecting network directionality has the scope to eliminate states that correlate highly with the directed modular structure of the brain. A numerical analysis of the distribution of attractor states identified a small set of prototypical direction-dependent activity patterns that potentially constitute a `skeleton' of the non-stationary dynamics typically observed in the brain. This study thereby emphasizes the substantial role network directionality can have in shaping the brain's ability to both store and process information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Complex NetworksSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207