MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092651889 · doi:10.3390/en13205413

Real-Time Digital Twin of a Wound Rotor Induction Machine Based on Finite Element Method

2020· article· en· W3092651889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsRotor (electric)Finite element methodRotation (mathematics)Fault (geology)HarmonicComputer sciencePower (physics)TorqueReliability (semiconductor)Process (computing)Control engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceAcousticsVoltagePhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring and early fault prediction of large electrical machines is important to maintain a sustainable and safe power system. With the ever-increasing computational power of modern processors, real-time simulation based monitoring of electrical machines is becoming a topic of interest. This work describes the development of a real-time digital twin (RTDT) of a wound rotor induction machine (WRIM) using a precomputed finite element model fed with online measurements. It computes accurate outputs in real-time of electromagnetic quantities otherwise difficult to measure such as local magnetic flux, current in bars and torque. In addition, it considers space harmonics, magnetic imbalance and fault conditions. The development process of the RTDT is described thoroughly and outputs are compared in real-time to measurements taken from the actual machine in rotation. Results show that they are accurate with harmonic content respected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it