MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092811716

Stigma, Discrimination & Marginalization: Gateways to Oppression of Persons with Disabilities in Ghana, West Africa

2013· article· en· W3092811716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Social Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOppressionStigma (botany)LimitingPerceptionSocial exclusionEconomic growthSociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyPoliticsLawPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disability can be socially constructed through the actions of society in erecting barriers and structures that limit the ability of certain persons in society to function “normally”. Such barriers also limit the ability of such persons to access the opportunities, privileges and resources in society. This study examines the societal perceptions about persons with disabilities in Ghana, which cast them as needy, feeble and “abnormal” persons. These perceptions have the effect of limiting their access to resources in society. The situation is even harder for children with disabilities who are denied the opportunity and prospects of inclusive education. The study draws on the perspectives from persons with disabilities themselves, educators, community members, and social workers in Ghana, West Africa. It provides recommendations on the need to recognize and remove the societal barriers that prevent persons with disabilities from functioning as “normal” members of society with the same rights as other citizens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it