Modelling of pathogen-host systems using deeper ORF annotations and transcriptomics to inform proteomics analyses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Zika virus is a flavivirus that can cause fulminant outbreaks and lead to Guillain-Barré syndrome, microcephaly and fetal demise. Like other flaviviruses, the Zika virus is transmitted by mosquitoes and provokes neurological disorders. Despite its risk to public health, no antiviral nor vaccine are currently available. In the recent years, several studies have set to identify human host proteins interacting with Zika viral proteins to better understand its pathogenicity. Yet these studies used standard human protein sequence databases. Such databases rely on genome annotations, which enforce a minimal open reading frame (ORF) length criterion. An ever-increasing number of studies have demonstrated the shortcomings of such annotation, which overlooks thousands of functional ORFs. Here we show that the use of a customized database including currently non-annotated proteins led to the identification of 4 alternative proteins as interactors of the viral capsid and NS4A proteins. Furthermore, 12 alternative proteins were identified in the proteome profiling of Zika infected monocytes, one of which was significantly up-regulated. This study presents a computational framework for the re-analysis of proteomics datasets to better investigate the viral-host protein interplays upon infection with the Zika virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it