On Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Matrix, Stochastic and Differential Games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis, we investigate reinforcement learning algorithms on matrix, stochastic, and differential games. In matrix and stochastic games, the states and actions are represented in continuous domains. We propose two decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms to solve the problem of learning in matrix and stochastic games when the learning agent has only minimum knowledge about the underlying game and the other learning agents. The proposed algorithms are the constant learning rate-based exponential moving average Q-learning (CLR-EMAQL) algorithm, and the exponential moving average Q-learning (EMAQL) algorithm. We mathematically show that the proposed CLR-EMAQL algorithm converges to Nash equilibrium in games with pure Nash equilibrium. We introduce the concept of Win-or-Learn-Slow (WoLS) mechanism for the proposed EMAQL algorithm so that the proposed algorithm learns fast when it is winning, and learns cautiously when it is losing. We also provide a theoretical proof of convergence to Nash equilibrium for the proposed EMAQL algorithm in games with pure Nash equilibrium. In games with mixed Nash equilibrium, our mathematical analysis shows that the proposed EMAQL algorithm converges to an equilibrium. Although our mathematical analysis does not explicitly show that the proposed EMAQL algorithm converges to Nash equilibrium, our simulation results indicate that the proposed EMAQL algorithm does converge to Nash equilibrium. Our simulation iii results also show the convergence of the proposed algorithms to Nash equilibrium over a variety of matrix and stochastic games that some of the state-of-the-art multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms fail to converge to Nash equilibrium at.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".