MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine Learning for Competitive Grain Growth Behavior in Additive Manufacturing Ti6Al4V

2020· article· en· W3093387454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATEC Web of Conferences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaguchi methodsArtificial neural networkTitanium alloyMaterials scienceWork (physics)Deposition (geology)Artificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringComputer scienceMachine learningProcess engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialAlloyGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) technology is now changing the pattern of the high-end manufacturing industry, among which MAM fabricated Ti6Al4V has been far the most extensively investigated material and attracts a lot of research interests. This work established a deep neural network (DNN) to investigate the grain boundary in competitive grain growth for a bi-crystal system, the column β grains of Ti6Al4V as an example. Because of the limited number of experimental samples, the DNN is trained based on the data coming from the Geometrical Limited criterion. A series of direct energy deposition experiment using Ti6Al4V is carried out under the Taguchi experimental design. The grain boundary angles between the column grains are measured in the experiment and used to evaluate the accuracy of DNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it